The CSS21 issues list (http://wiki.csswg.org/spec/css2.1#issue-158) seems to have incorrect proposal URLs for Issues 158 and 159: *) the proposal URL for Issue 158 points to version 5 of the margin collapsing rewrite; *) the proposal URL for Issue 159 points to version 4 of the margin collapsing rewrite. No doubt the version 5 link should have replaced the pre-existing proposal URL for Issue 159 instead of that for Issue 158. The proposal URL for Issue 158 should, I think, be http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2010Aug/0458.html as cited in the Minutes and Resolutions for 2010-09-08. Cheers, Anton Prowse http://dev.moonhenge.net
Similar:
- [CSS21] 8.3.1 Collapsing margins – editorial issues I find the presentation order of 8.3.1 rather unhelpful. It begins by vaguely defining "collapsing margins" without really explaining what happens. It then makes a...
- How to spread business proposal to companies ? Hi everyone I own a small company that moves in IT business such as Web Design, Graph Design, etc.. I’ve made a proposal however to...
- [css21] ISSUE-138 I have missed part of the conversation apparently and what I have agreed with is not exactly what is in the final text... The behavior...
- [CSS21] list-item box generation – editorial issues Issue 1. 9.2.1 (Block-level elements and block boxes) says:[1] # Some block-level elements generate additional boxes outside of the # principal box: 'list-item' elements. These...
- [CSSWG] Minutes and Resolutions 2010-08-18 Summary: - Reviewed F2F agenda - CSS2.1 Beta 3 published http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-css-testsuite/2010Aug/0033.html - RESOLVED: fantasai's new proposal accepted for CSS2.1 Issue 56 - RESOLVED: proposal accepted...